March 2026

Foreign Investment Triggers BEA Reporting: Is Your Company Compliant with U.S. Reporting Requirements?

What is the BEA?

The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) compiles official statistics on foreign direct investment (FDI)—both inbound (foreign ownership of U.S. businesses) and outbound (U.S. ownership of foreign businesses). Those numbers come from mandatory surveys in 15 C.F.R. Part 801 (e.g., BE‑13, BE‑15, BE‑12, BE‑10), and the government has been actively tuning, publicizing, and correcting these rules—then expecting companies to file on time, with penalties for noncompliance.

Who Must Report?

The BEA requires any U.S. business enterprise, except certain private funds, in which 1) at least 10% of the U.S. business has been acquired by a foreign entity, and 2) the acquisition cost greater than $40 million, to report the acquisition, expansion, or creation of its business in the U.S. Similarly, the U.S. entity with a foreign affiliate must report its outbound investment to the BEA.

Penalties for Not Reporting

Although the BEA rarely makes headlines for high-profile enforcement cases, BEA surveys are not optional. U.S. companies that fall within the scope of these rules, and fail to report to the BEA, are subject to a civil penalty under 22 U.S.C 3105. Additionally, a willful failure to report could lead to both a monetary fine and, if an individual, imprisonment for up to one year (See Forms BE-13A, -13C, -13D-10A) The monetary fines range between $5,761 to $5,911 for negligent failure to furnish information, and between $57,617 to $59,114 for the willful failure to furnish information.

Reports to the BEA generate the backbone of official FDI statistics that investors, journalists, […]

By |2026-03-27T15:59:21-04:00March 24, 2026|U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis|0 Comments

Breaking Trade News: Jones Act Waiver, CBP 5106 Ruling, OFAC Sanctions

Here is a recap of the latest customs and international trade law news:

Administration    

  • President Trump issued a 60-day waiver to the Jones Act, temporarily allowing foreign-flagged ships carrying oil and gas to travel between US ports. 
  • The text of the Ecuador-U.S. trade agreement was released and includes a long list of products that will receive most-favored nation tariff rate treatment in the U.S. Roughly 50% of Ecuador’s exports will see MFN treatment as a result of the deal.  

Customs and Border Protection (CBP)    

  • CBP ruled that the submission of a CBP Form 5106 on an importer’s behalf constitutes “customs business” and requires a broker license. 
  • CBP seized 35 e-bikes from China that violated federal motor vehicle safety standards. 
  • Ahead of Passover and Easter season, CBP issued a reminder to check the latest agricultural import requirements for those traveling with fresh flowers, plants, seeds, fruits, vegetables, and decorated eggs. 
  • CBP officers at the Port of Rochester and Port of Buffalo seized a variety of designer items bearing counterfeit trademarks. Had these designer items been genuine, the total manufacturer-suggested retail price (MSRP) value would […]
By |2026-03-20T12:29:21-04:00March 20, 2026|news, Snapshot|0 Comments

Avoid Penalties, Build Confidence: Importers Thrive in CBP’s Recordkeeping Compliance Program

Authors: 
Jennifer Diaz, President, Diaz Trade Law
Amber Pirson, Attorney, Diaz Trade Law

What Is the Recordkeeping Compliance Program?

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) requires importers to maintain and produce specific records related to their entries. Under 19 C.F.R. § 163.12, CBP offers a Recordkeeping Compliance Program—a voluntary and free certification program designed to help importers strengthen their internal controls, improve record management, and demonstrate a proactive commitment to compliance. 

At its core, the program allows importers to work collaboratively with CBP to ensure they understand their obligations under the Customs Modernization Act (Mod Act) and are equipped to meet them. Certification signals that an importer has established reliable procedures for maintaining, retrieving, and producing required entry records. 

What Are the Benefits of the Program?

Participating in the Recordkeeping Compliance Program offers several meaningful advantages:  

  • Reduced Exposure to Penalties 

Certified importers may receive mitigation benefits if they inadvertently fail to produce certain records. CBP recognizes that certified companies have invested in compliance infrastructure and may treat isolated lapses more leniently. 

  • Stronger Relationship With CBP 

Certification demonstrates good faith and transparency. Importers who demonstrate that they take compliance seriously often experience smoother interactions with CBP, including during audits, inquiries, and enforcement actions. 

  • Improved Internal Controls 

The certification process requires importers to evaluate and […]

Section 301 Investigation into Forced Labor Practices — US Allies and FTA Partners Under Scrutiny

On March 12, 2026, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) published its Initiation of Section 301 Investigations into the practices of various economies, including that of US allies and long-standing trade partners, for their alleged failure to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor.  

What Can the USTR Do? 

Section 301, formally known as Title III of the Trade Act of 1974 or “Relief from Unfair Trade Practices,” authorizes the USTR to investigate acts, policies, or practices that it considers unreasonable, discriminatory, or burdensome to US commerce. The USTR goes on to say that practices which permit forced or compulsory labor meet the criteria of unreasonable, unfair, and inequitable. If the USTR concludes that an act is “unjustifiable” and “burdens or restricts” US commerce, action is mandatory. On the other hand, if the USTR determines that such act is only “unreasonable or discriminatory” and “burdens or restricts” US commerce, action is discretionary. In either case, when the USTR aims to remedy a foreign trade practice, the agency can (1) impose tariffs or other import restrictions, (2) withdraw or suspend trade agreement concessions, or (3) enter into a binding agreement with the foreign government to either cease the conduct in question or compensate the US. Additionally, the statute requires that when USTR’s action is mandatory, the agency’s action should “affect goods or services of the foreign country in an amount that is equivalent in value to the burden or restriction […]

By |2026-03-16T08:20:41-04:00March 16, 2026|Forced Labor|0 Comments
Go to Top