LinkedInFacebookInstagramXYouTube
305-456-3830|info@diaztradelaw.com

Enforcement

Call 305-456-3830 or email info@diaztradelaw.com.

New WRO Issued Against Goods Made in Mauritius by Firemount Group

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issued a  Withhold Release Order (WRO) against imports made in Mauritius by manufacturer Firemount Group Ltd. (Firemount) after an investigation indicated forced labor use. This WRO was the fourth issued in 2025. CBP now oversees and enforces 54 WROs and nine Findings.

What Happened

On November 18, 2025, CBP issued the WRO against garments, apparel, and textiles manufactured in Mauritius by Firemount. CBP will immediately detain imports subject to the Order. The WRO was issued based on information that reasonably indicates forced labor was used in violation of 19 U.S.C. §1307.

In making this determination, CBP conducted an investigation and analyzed supporting evidence, including interview questionnaires, audio recordings and transcripts, open-source reports from nongovernmental organizations, news media, and academic research.  

The evidence demonstrated that Firemount workers are subject to four International Labour Organization indicators of forced labor: abuse of vulnerability, debt bondage, deception, intimidation, and threats. 

WRO Background 

The strategic use of WROs by CBP has been especially effective at identifying certain nations, industries, and companies that employ forced labor. CBP issues WROs after receiving information that reasonably indicates the use of prison or forced labor at any point in an imported product’s supply chain. Before the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (TFTEA), the United States had only implemented 30 WROs in the previous five decades. […]

By |2025-12-01T10:04:19-05:00December 1, 2025|Enforcement, Forced Labor, Import, International Trade, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|0 Comments
Read More

Tariffs at the Supreme Court!

Yesterday was a big day for trade law! The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump. The case challenges whether the President has the authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). 

There’s been a lot of back and forth among trade lawyers about how the court will rule. 

Here are our predictions:

After today’s hearing, we’re confident that the Supreme Court will side with the importers and uphold the lower court’s ruling. 

Several justices asked very pointed questions and seemed to express skepticism that IEEPA grants the President broad authority to impose tariffs. At one point, Justice Roberts, a key vote, even called the Administration’s reading of the law a “misfit.”

Importantly, Justice Coney Barrett discussed recovery and questioned whether relief for importers would be a “complete mess”. It is critical that importers file a lawsuit with the CIT to preserve their ability to recover tariff refunds if and when the court overturns the tariffs. Get in touch with Diaz Trade Law for assistance – 305-456-3830 or info@diaztradelaw.com.

Keep up with the latest tariff and trade deal news here.

Learn more:

By |2025-11-06T09:52:16-05:00November 6, 2025|Enforcement, International Trade, tariffs|0 Comments
Read More

Tariff Updates: Heavy Trucks, Timber & Lumber, Vessel Fees

Over the past several weeks, there has been a flurry of tariff updates affecting importers across multiple industries. From tariffs on heavy-duty vehicles and timber to 232 exclusions and vessel fees, the trade landscape is moving fast, and staying compliant is more challenging than ever. To help you keep up, we’ve summarized recent key tariff developments you need to know. For a full list of tariffs and trade deals, visit our tracker here.

Heavy-Duty Vehicles and Vehicle Parts

On September 25, 2025, President Trump, via Truth Social, announced his intention to impose a 25% tariff on heavy trucks. On October 17, 2025, he issued a Presidential Proclamation formalizing and clarifying these tariffs. The proclamation imposes a 25% tariff on imports of medium- and heavy-duty trucks and truck parts. This includes Class 3 to Class 8 vehicles, like large pick-up trucks, moving trucks, cargo trucks, dump trucks, and tractors for eighteen-wheelers. 

The Proclamation also imposes a 10% tariff on imports of buses, including school buses, transit buses, and motor coaches. The tariffs are set to take effect on November 1, 2025.

President Trump is imposing the new tariffs under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, citing national security concerns.

If medium and heavy-duty vehicles qualify for USMCA treatment, the importer may submit documentation to identify the amount of U.S. content, and, after the Department of Commerce’s […]

By |2025-10-24T10:50:49-04:00October 24, 2025|Enforcement, International Trade, U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC)|0 Comments
Read More

ICYMI: BIS Imposes New Affiliates Rule

[Update November 10, 2025]: BIS imposed a one-year suspension of the interim final rule. The suspension is set to end November 9, 2026, absent a future extension.

On September 30, 2025, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) released an interim rule regarding “Affiliates.” Under the rule, any entity that is at least 50% owned by one or more entities on the Entity List or the Military End-User (MEU) List will itself automatically be subject to Entity List/MEU restrictions. This is a significant change from the current standard, which excludes entities that are not specifically included on the Entity List or MEU List, regardless of any affiliation with Entity List or MEU List organizations. 

This rule is effective September 29, 2025.

Entity, MEU List Background

The Entity List identifies persons (including businesses, research institutions, government and private organizations, individuals, and other types of legal persons) reasonably believed to be involved, or to pose a significant risk of being or becoming involved, in activities contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States. These persons are subject to specific license requirements for the export, reexport, and/or transfer (in-country) of specified items.  

BIS first published the Entity List in 1997. Since its initial publication, grounds for inclusion on the Entity List have expanded to activities sanctioned by the State Department and activities contrary to U.S. […]

By |2025-11-10T18:59:28-05:00October 17, 2025|Enforcement, Export, International Trade, U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC)|0 Comments
Read More

FDA Launches Real-Time Adverse Event Reporting Dashboard for Cosmetic Products

On September 12, 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the launch of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard for Cosmetic Products. The system is an interactive tool designed to facilitate the public’s ability to search and find real-time adverse event data on cosmetic products. Through the tool, users can search and view reports using search terms, including the product name. Users can also download data sets and report listings. The FDA will update the tool daily to ensure it includes the most recent submissions.

The dashboard includes serious adverse event reports submitted by responsible persons for cosmetic products under requirements established by the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA), as well as voluntary adverse event reports submitted to the FDA by healthcare professionals, consumers, salon professionals, cosmetologists, and others. 

This announcement follows a recent launch of real-time reporting of adverse event and medication errors data for drugs and therapeutic biologics. 

In the announcement, the FDA stated these real-time reporting tools are part of the agency’s commitment to transparency and providing greater insight into the safety and regulation of the products consumers use every day.

Note: Reports in this dashboard have not been verified by the FDA, and their publication does not indicate that the FDA has concluded the product caused the adverse event. 

By |2025-09-19T09:48:31-04:00September 19, 2025|Cosmetics, Enforcement, FDA Issues, International Trade, Pre-compliance, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)|0 Comments
Read More
This website uses cookies and third party services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the Privacy Policy. OK
Skip to content
Go to Top