LinkedInFacebookInstagramXYouTube
305-456-3830|info@diaztradelaw.com

International Trade

Call 305-456-3830 or email info@diaztradelaw.com.

DTL’s Jennifer Diaz and David Craven Featured in CNBC

We are thrilled to announce DTL’s Jennifer Diaz and Of Counsel David Craven were recently featured in an article by CNBC.

Reporter Lori Ann LaRocco dives into the recent rise in customs bond insufficiency notices in her Feb. 6 article: President Trump’s tariffs fueled U.S. Customs bond market boom. Now billions hang on Supreme Court ruling.

Here are two excerpts from the piece:

“Jennifer Diaz, board-certified international attorney at Diaz Trade Law, said the number of bond insufficiency notices issued has quadrupled since 2017 and has accelerated recently due to the volatile tariff environment.”

“David Craven, counsel to Diaz Trade, said the threat of new replacement tariffs, coupled with the existing liability facing surety companies, suggests that any refunds would not be immediate. “The fact that liability has gone up, and Customs is now asking the sureties for collateral … operations are at risk, and sureties understandably don’t want to be caught holding the bag,” Craven said.”

Read the full article here.

Jennifer Diaz was also featured in a separate CNBC piece on Feb. 12: Trump tariffs leave importers with record-breaking $3.5 billion U.S. Customs bond funding shortfall.

Jen said:

“In totality, it makes sense that insufficiencies are more than double,” said Jennifer Diaz, attorney at Diaz Trade Law. “Many companies take it for granted that a $50,000 bond should be able to cover you for […]

By |2026-02-19T06:34:31-05:00February 19, 2026|International Trade, news, tariffs, Trade Policy, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|0 Comments
Read More

Section 232 Valuation in a Gray Area: What Importers Need to Know

Over the past year, the Section 232 tariff landscape for steel and aluminum has shifted rapidly. A series of presidential actions in 2025 significantly expanded the scope of Section 232 steel and aluminum duties while offering limited instruction on how those duties should be assessed. As a result, companies importing steel and aluminum-containing products are facing unclear guidance at a time when CBP scrutiny – and enforcement – is increasing. This lack of clear guidance has led to a lot of importer confusion and to the lawsuit discussed below.

Background on New Steel and Aluminum Tariffs

On February 11, 2025, President Trump issued two Proclamations imposing enhanced import tariffs on steel and aluminum products under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. While additional Section 232 tariffs had been in place on certain steel and aluminum products since the first Trump Administration in 2018, the orders eliminated certain exemptions from the tariffs, expanded their scope to cover additional products, and increased the tariffs on covered aluminum goods from 10% to 25%.

On February 18, 2025, two Federal Register Notices were published that included lists of “derivative” steel and aluminum products subject to the 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum under Section 232. The Federal Register Notices, which include the specific Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) classifications for the derivative products in Annex 1, are available

By |2026-02-11T22:14:42-05:00February 11, 2026|Import, International Trade, tariffs, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|0 Comments
Read More

Compliance Mistakes Can Turn Criminal: Don’t Let This Happen to You

Many importers assume that customs compliance issues are purely administrative and can be easily resolved. In reality, customs law and criminal law intersect far more often than most companies realize. What begins as a civil customs matter can escalate quickly into a criminal investigation when regulators suspect fraud, evasion, or willful misconduct.

When Customs Issues Cross the Line

Most customs violations start as a civil enforcement matter. Errors involving classification, valuation, country of origin, or admissibility are often addressed through a request for information (CBP 28), notice of action (CBP 29), protest, prior disclosure, or penalty proceeding. However, when patterns emerge or when agencies believe false statements or deliberate schemes are involved, the enforcement posture can change dramatically.

Federal agencies, including U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), and the Department of Justice (DOJ), routinely collaborate to investigate potential criminal violations tied to import activity. These investigations may focus on:

  • Undervaluation or misclassification to avoid duties
  • False statements or omissions in entry documentation
  • Evasion of import restrictions or regulatory requirements
  • Coordinated schemes involving suppliers, brokers, or intermediaries

Once criminal intent is suspected, importers may face subpoenas, search warrants, asset seizures, or even criminal charges.

Increased Focus on Enforcement

The recent volatile tariff environment has created increased incentives to cheat the system. The U.S. government has made clear that it is

By |2026-01-30T10:24:39-05:00January 30, 2026|Enforcement, Import, International Trade, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)|0 Comments
Read More

Importer End-of-Year Checklist: How to Strengthen Compliance and Prepare for the Year Ahead

For U.S. importers, the end of the year is a critical moment to evaluate compliance, correct issues, and prepare for the year ahead. With tariff changes, supply chain uncertainty, and an increased focus on enforcement, importers who take a proactive approach now will start the new year strong. Here’s a practical checklist for your year-end review.

1. Review Import Data for Accuracy

Begin with a thorough audit of your import data. Confirm that HTS classifications are correct and current, declared values accurately reflect your transactions, and country-of-origin determinations are well documented. Small mistakes can lead to large penalties.

2. Reassess Tariffs and Duty Exposure

Year-end is the ideal time to evaluate whether you are paying unnecessary duties and explore your options for tariff mitigation strategies. Consider what exclusions have changed, whether tariff engineering may reduce costs, or whether sourcing strategies should be updated. Many importers discover duty-saving opportunities simply by reassessing their tariff positions annually.

3. Strengthen Forced Labor Compliance

With UFLPA enforcement intensifying, importers must confirm that supplier information, ownership structures, and supply chain documentation are up to date. Now is the time to verify traceability records, refresh internal training, and assess whether high-risk suppliers require additional review.

4. Update Written Compliance Procedures

If your compliance manual or SOPs haven’t been updated this year, they’re likely outdated. Written processes should reflect current regulations, product updates, tariff changes, and internal workflow adjustments. CBP expects importers to document their […]

By |2025-12-22T09:00:19-05:00December 22, 2025|Best Practices, Import, International Trade, Pre-compliance, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|0 Comments
Read More

ICYMI: Electronics Company Pays $11.8M to Resolve Duty Evasion Allegations

The Department of Justice announced that Harman International Industries, Inc., an audio electronics company, agreed to pay $11.8M to settle allegations of evading duties on goods made of aluminum from China.

What Happened

For a period of over ten years, from June 2011 to March 2023, Harman knowingly imported heat sinks that contained extruded aluminum from China without paying the required antidumping and countervailing duties (AD/CVD).

The settlement also reveals that when Harman discovered its failure to pay AD/CVD, the company concealed this fact and decided not to disclose it to the U.S. government. 

This case arose from a whistleblower lawsuit filed under the False Claims Act, which permits private parties to file suit on behalf of the United States for false claims and share in a portion of the government’s recovery. The whistleblower in this case will receive over $2M of the settlement proceeds.

Enforcement is a Top Priority for the U.S. Government

High tariffs in the current trade environment have created a higher incentive to cheat. The U.S. government has made clear that enforcing customs laws is a top priority. 

For example, on May 12, 2025, Matthew Galeotti, the Head of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Criminal Division, sent a memo to all criminal division personnel highlighting the focus areas of the division for white-collar crime.

The memo included a […]

By |2025-12-12T09:10:25-05:00December 12, 2025|Enforcement, Import, International Trade, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)|0 Comments
Read More
This website uses cookies and third party services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the Privacy Policy. OK
Skip to content
Go to Top