News & Articles

Mandatory vs. Voluntary CFIUS Filings: Triggers, Timing, and How to Report a Mandatory Transaction 

Authors:
Jennifer Diaz, President, Diaz Trade Law
Amber Pirson, Attorney, Diaz Trade Law

The Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act (FIRRMA) created limited mandatory filing requirements—departing from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)’s historically voluntary regime—and Treasury has continued to sharpen enforcement tools and penalties. Understanding when a filing is compulsory (and how to do it) reduces execution risk and avoids costly post‑closing surprises.  

When a CFIUS filing is mandatory 

Two categories trigger a mandatory submission (via declaration, with the option to file a full notice instead): 

  • Foreign government “substantial interest” in a TID U.S. business. If (i) a foreign government holds a 49%+ voting interest in the foreign acquirer, and (ii) that acquirer obtains a 25%+ voting interest (“substantial interest”) in a TID U.S. business (one involving critical technology, critical infrastructure, or sensitive personal data), a filing is mandatory. 
  • Critical technology + export authorization nexus. A filing is mandatory if the U.S. target produces, designs, tests, manufactures, fabricates, or develops a critical technology and a U.S. regulatory authorization (e.g., export license) would be required to transfer that technology to any relevant party to the transaction (including certain upstream owners).  

Timing rule. For a mandatory filing, the parties must submit at least 30 days before closing. The date of closing or “completion date” is the earliest date upon which the foreign person acquired any […]

By |2026-03-30T20:08:41-04:00March 29, 2026|CFIUS, U.S. Department of Treasury|0 Comments

Even AI Needs a License – Know When Automation Unlawfully Crosses Into “Customs Business” 

Authors:
Jennifer Diaz, President, Diaz Trade Law
Amber Pirson, Attorney, Diaz Trade Law

In January of this year, CBP quietly released a ruling (January 16, 2026/CEE.HQ H350722) that demarcates clear boundaries of where AI is permitted to facilitate Customs filings and where such artificial tools cross the “human-brokers-only” line.  

Case Background 

A foreign “Unlicensed Company” was operating an online platform and marketing to importers without seeking approval or a license from CBP. This platform offered four key services: 1) connecting importers to brokers, 2) utilizing an optical character recognition (OCR) tool to cull entry data from shipping documents, 3) generating HTSUS subheading suggestions for specific articles, and 4) submitting CBP Form 5106 on behalf of new importers. The question before CBP was whether the company was conducting customs business without a license. 

CBP Ruling 

In its ruling, CBP stated that the definition of “customs business” is quite broad. To that end, developers could accidentally create agentic parameters that trespass the bounds of what it means to engage in “customs business.” Here are some key takeaways from the ruling: 

  1. “CBP cautioned that an unlicensed entity may not serve as an intermediary between a broker and importer if the unlicensed entity is actively participating ‘in decisions and activities relating to the preparation or filing of Customs documents for imported merchandise, or relating to any other action amounting to customs business.’” However, since the “Unlicensed […]

What Happened This Month in International Trade (March 2026)

Another busy month in customs & international trade news: 

Court of International Trade (CIT) 

  • On March 4, 2026, Judge Eaton issued a strong and detailed order requiring the refunds of IEEPA Tariffs. We expect the government to appeal this order. Judge Eaton issued subsequent orders: (i) suspending the previous order to allow CBP time to implement their refund process; (ii) amending the previous order to include Brazil and India IEEPA tariffs.  
  • New York Attorney General Letitia James and prosecutors from 23 other states filed a lawsuit in the CIT to block President Trump’s global tariff regime under Section 122 and order refunds to states.  

Administration   

  • President Trump issued a 60-day waiver to the Jones Act, temporarily allowing foreign-flagged ships carrying oil and gas to travel between US ports. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP)    

  • CBP ruled that the submission of a CBP Form 5106 on an importer’s behalf constitutes “customs business” and requires a broker license.  
  • CBP’s Trade and Cargo Security Summit has been rescheduled to Sept. 8-10, from its original dates in April. CBP said this is due to the DHS lapse in appropriations. 

Congress   

By |2026-03-27T12:35:21-04:00March 27, 2026|news, Snapshot|0 Comments

Foreign Investment Triggers BEA Reporting: Is Your Company Compliant with U.S. Reporting Requirements?

What is the BEA?

The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) compiles official statistics on foreign direct investment (FDI)—both inbound (foreign ownership of U.S. businesses) and outbound (U.S. ownership of foreign businesses). Those numbers come from mandatory surveys in 15 C.F.R. Part 801 (e.g., BE‑13, BE‑15, BE‑12, BE‑10), and the government has been actively tuning, publicizing, and correcting these rules—then expecting companies to file on time, with penalties for noncompliance.

Who Must Report?

The BEA requires any U.S. business enterprise, except certain private funds, in which 1) at least 10% of the U.S. business has been acquired by a foreign entity, and 2) the acquisition cost greater than $40 million, to report the acquisition, expansion, or creation of its business in the U.S. Similarly, the U.S. entity with a foreign affiliate must report its outbound investment to the BEA.

Penalties for Not Reporting

Although the BEA rarely makes headlines for high-profile enforcement cases, BEA surveys are not optional. U.S. companies that fall within the scope of these rules, and fail to report to the BEA, are subject to a civil penalty under 22 U.S.C 3105. Additionally, a willful failure to report could lead to both a monetary fine and, if an individual, imprisonment for up to one year (See Forms BE-13A, -13C, -13D-10A) The monetary fines range between $5,761 to $5,911 for negligent failure to furnish information, and between $57,617 to $59,114 for the willful failure to furnish information.

Reports to the BEA generate the backbone of official FDI statistics that investors, journalists, […]

By |2026-03-27T15:59:21-04:00March 24, 2026|U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis|0 Comments

Breaking Trade News: Jones Act Waiver, CBP 5106 Ruling, OFAC Sanctions

Here is a recap of the latest customs and international trade law news:

Administration    

  • President Trump issued a 60-day waiver to the Jones Act, temporarily allowing foreign-flagged ships carrying oil and gas to travel between US ports. 
  • The text of the Ecuador-U.S. trade agreement was released and includes a long list of products that will receive most-favored nation tariff rate treatment in the U.S. Roughly 50% of Ecuador’s exports will see MFN treatment as a result of the deal.  

Customs and Border Protection (CBP)    

  • CBP ruled that the submission of a CBP Form 5106 on an importer’s behalf constitutes “customs business” and requires a broker license. 
  • CBP seized 35 e-bikes from China that violated federal motor vehicle safety standards. 
  • Ahead of Passover and Easter season, CBP issued a reminder to check the latest agricultural import requirements for those traveling with fresh flowers, plants, seeds, fruits, vegetables, and decorated eggs. 
  • CBP officers at the Port of Rochester and Port of Buffalo seized a variety of designer items bearing counterfeit trademarks. Had these designer items been genuine, the total manufacturer-suggested retail price (MSRP) value would […]
By |2026-03-20T12:29:21-04:00March 20, 2026|news, Snapshot|0 Comments
Go to Top